- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:43:37 -0700
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
For starters, filter shapes are not "applied to the data graph", so, no. peter On 09/27/2016 03:38 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Peter, would this suggestion work better for you? I assume someone could argue > that "applied" is not defined. > > Holger > > > > On 28/09/2016 1:44, Karen Coyle wrote: >> Filter shapes must be ... >> - applied to the data graph >> ... before validating.... >> >> >> On 9/26/16 4:38 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >>> Does anyone else find this sentence unclear? If yes, could someone >>> suggest alternative wording? >>> >>> "Filter shapes MUST be validated before validating the associated shapes >>> or constraints." >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Holger >>> >>> >>> On 27/09/2016 1:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>>> How is a shape "validated"? >>>> >>>> This problem even affects the second half of the sentence I initially >>>> quoted. >>>> >>>> peter >>>> >>>> On 09/26/2016 12:18 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >>>>> Replaced with "validated": >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/d4fbdebd7044cd79f35985a75a54994ea3facde9 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Holger >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 26/09/2016 15:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>>>>> "Filter shapes MUST be evaluated before validating the associated >>>>>> shapes or >>>>>> constraints." >>>>>> >>>>>> Evaluation is not defined. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> peter >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:44:13 UTC