public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from September 2016 by author

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-106 (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-163 (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-142 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: comment about SHACL Status of This Document (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-106 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-107 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-107 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-106 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-142 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: on constraints (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155 (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: on evaluation (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-163 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: fun with sh:hasShape (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on ontologies/vocabulary (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on ontologies/vocabulary (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on recursion in SHACL (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Union operations on graphs (Sunday, 25 September)
• Re: Different levels of SHACL (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: Deep copy (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: Different levels of SHACL (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: Union operations on graphs (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: Order of filters (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Wednesday, 14 September)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: on sh:Shape vs sh:shape (Monday, 26 September)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: on literals as shapes (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: on literals as shapes (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: on evaluation (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: on definition and declaration (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: on property constraints vs focus node constraints (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Deep copy (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on evaluation (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on entailment (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Deep copy (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on sh:Shape vs sh:shape (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: On representation and typing (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on evaluation (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on entailment (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Deep copy (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Deep copy (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on undefined in SHACL (Monday, 26 September)
• Deep copy (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) (Friday, 23 September)
• Union operations on graphs (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) (Friday, 23 September)
• $shapesGraph (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) (Friday, 23 September)
• Order of filters (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) (Friday, 23 September)
• Different levels of SHACL (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) (Friday, 23 September)
• $this in Aggregations (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/) (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Wednesday, 14 September)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on evaluation (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount (Monday, 26 September)

Jeremy J Carroll

• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)
• comment about SHACL Status of This Document (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)
• About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)

Karen Coyle

• Re: on evaluation (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on evaluation (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on literals as shapes (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-163 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on evaluation (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on evaluation (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Deep copy (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Different levels of SHACL (Sunday, 25 September)
• Re: Different levels of SHACL (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: [CODE4LIB] SHACL Core abstract syntax (Saturday, 10 September)
• Re: [CODE4LIB] SHACL Core abstract syntax (Tuesday, 6 September)

Miika Alonen

• Re: Validating instances based on other instances (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Validating instances based on other instances (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration (Wednesday, 14 September)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: on constraints (Friday, 30 September)
• on classes from the SHACL vocabulary (Friday, 30 September)
• on constraints (Friday, 30 September)
• on poor wording and loose terminology for prefix handling (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on evaluation (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-107 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-106 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on evaluation (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-142 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-142 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-163 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on literals as shapes (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-107 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on the closing of ISSUE-106 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)
• on the closing of ISSUE-107 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• on the closing of ISSUE-106 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• on the closing of ISSUE-163 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• on the closing of ISSUE-155 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on literals as shapes (Tuesday, 27 September)
• on the closing of ISSUE-142 (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: on literals as shapes (Tuesday, 27 September)
• the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: on evaluation (Tuesday, 27 September)
• on order of evaluation in SHACL vs SPARQL [was Re: Order of filters] (Tuesday, 27 September)
• on literals as shapes (Tuesday, 27 September)
• more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape] (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: fun with sh:hasShape (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: on property constraints vs focus node constraints (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Deep copy (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount (Monday, 26 September)
• fun with sh:hasShape (Monday, 26 September)
• on property constraints vs focus node constraints (Monday, 26 September)
• on sh:Shape vs sh:shape (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on ontologies/vocabulary (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: On representation and typing (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on recursion in SHACL (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on evaluation (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on entailment (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Deep copy (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on ontologies/vocabulary (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Deep copy (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL (Monday, 26 September)
• on definition and declaration (Monday, 26 September)
• On representation and typing (Monday, 26 September)
• on ontologies/vocabulary (Monday, 26 September)
• on entailment (Monday, 26 September)
• on evaluation (Monday, 26 September)
• $shapesGraph and sh:hasShape (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: Union operations on graphs (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: Different levels of SHACL (and a new undefined notion and misuse of MAY) (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: Deep copy (Saturday, 24 September)
• divergence in the definition of sh:minCount (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: $this in Aggregations (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Different levels of SHACL (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: $shapesGraph (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Deep copy (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Order of filters (Friday, 23 September)
• a general comment on Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL), W3C,Editor's Draft 22 September 2016 (Friday, 23 September)
• on access to the shapes graph in SHACL (Friday, 23 September)
• on undefined in SHACL (Friday, 23 September)
• on recursion in SHACL (Friday, 23 September)
• on property paths in SHACL (Friday, 23 September)
• on failure in SHACL (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ (Thursday, 22 September)

Simon Steyskal

• Re: Validating instances based on other instances (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: on sh:Shape vs sh:shape (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Validating instances based on other instances (Tuesday, 27 September)

Stuart A. Yeates

• Re: [CODE4LIB] SHACL Core abstract syntax (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Re: [CODE4LIB] SHACL Core abstract syntax (Tuesday, 6 September)

Wendy Seltzer

• Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)

Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2016 13:49:20 UTC