- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 03:48:09 -0700
- To: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>, "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
I find overriding to be a very scary feature. It is hard to define in this context and hard to understand. I strongly suggest that it not be a part of whatever comes out of a spec for RDF constraints. Overriding does not appear to be a part of the ShEx member submission. peter On 07/22/2014 03:35 AM, Olivier Rossel wrote: > Hi all. > I would like to point out that ShEx has some ideas about a nice feature coming > from RelaxNG: > "extending and overriding shapes" > > cf the discussion here > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Discussion_SHEX_format#Discussion_2.2C_redefining_and_including_other_SHEX_definitions > > This is really elegant and handy feature when you deal with data descriptions > on the long term (in standards, for example). > > I am not sure SPIN or ICV have any support for an equivalent feature. > True? > > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 10:48:40 UTC