W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2009

ISSUE-237: Better rdf:List support in RDFa 1.1

From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:38:33 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-swd-wg@w3.org,public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Message-Id: <20090910053833.371D36B646@tibor.w3.org>

ISSUE-237: Better rdf:List support in RDFa 1.1

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/237

Raised by: Ben Adida
On product: RDFa

by Toby Inkster:

"""
The following language in a future spec would make marking up lists  
in RDFa much easier:

===
RDFa 1.1 processors MUST handle the property rdfs:member specially.  
If the subject of a triple with predicate rdfs:member is known to be  
an rdf:List, then the processor MUST add appropriate rdf:first,  
rdf:rest, and rdf:nil triples to assemble the list. If the subject of  
a triple with predicate rdfs:member is known to be a rdf:Bag, rdf:Alt  
or rdf:Seq, then the processor MUST add appropriate rdf:_1, rdf:_2,  
etc triples.

"Known to be" = RDFa processors MUST recognise the explicit container  
types rdf:List, rdf:Bag, rdf:Alt and rdf:Seq. RDFa processors MAY  
implement RDFS, OWL or other reasoning to determine that other  
resources may be containers.
===

"""

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Sep/0070.html
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 05:38:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 September 2009 05:38:44 GMT