W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > October 2009

Re: Telecon Agenda - 29 October 2009 *1500* UTC, though note that's a change for Europeans with daylight savings

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:41:31 +0000
Message-ID: <640dd5060910290441w2e6f2ff1o9ad5d9712b123fe0@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Ben,

I was still thinking that the call was at 4pm, so I'm afraid I have
double-booked; it's school half-term here, so at 3pm we'll have just
finished watching 'Up' in the cinema.

One small thing, on your point 4: I agree we should start prototyping,
but also I've been trying to think of a simple 'switch' that allows
authors to indicate that they are making use of some prototype. Maybe
it's as simple as @version with some agreed values -- perhaps we
simply agree a token to represent some 'idea in progress', and the
presence of that token in @version means that a parser can use this
additional functionality.

And on 4.b, if you get to discussing it -- my proposal before was that
we should slightly modify the definition of a CURIE such that it's
based not just on the syntax (i.e., "x:y") but also on the presence of
a prefix mapping. In short, if there is no mapping of "x" then *by
definition* "x:y" is not a CURIE.

Whether it then becomes a URI is down to the containing environment --
all I'm suggesting in this first step is that we prevent the CURIE
syntax from swallowing the string. It's nothing more than acting as if
a function isCurie( s ) returns false for "x:y" if "x" was not

I don't doubt there are problems with this (I think Toby raised some,
but apologies if it was someone else -- I don't have time to go back
and check), but I thought I'd mention it, because I won't be on the



On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I believe Europe has changed to daylights savings, so hopefully if we keep
> things at 1500 UTC, that won't be too much of a problem.
> -Ben
> ==========
> Thursday, October 29th 2009
> 1500 UTC, W3C Zakim bridge
> tel:+1.617.761.6200 conference code RDFA
> irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#rdfa
> Duration: 60 minutes
> Scribe: Zakim, pick a victim
> ==========
> Agenda:
> 1) Action Items
> http://www.w3.org/2009/10/22-rdfa-minutes.html#ActionSummary
> 2) RDFa WG Charter
> http://rdfa.info/wiki/Rdfa-wg-charter
> brief discussion of points to add
> 3) Test Cases -- relegated to the mailing list, so we can focus on (4).
> PLEASE participate in mailing list discussion of these.
> 4) RDFa 1.1 issues: where do we stand, should we start prototyping?
> (brief high-level discussion of where we each lean and what our options
> are.)
>  a) @typeof=""
>  b) URIs everywhere
>  c) profile/vocab discussion
>  d) DOM API
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2009 11:42:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:33 UTC