W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > November 2009

Re: Call for Review of XHTML Test Cases 158, 160, 162, 164

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:48:51 -0600
Message-ID: <4B019E93.7050103@aptest.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
CC: RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
TC158: approved (I don't mind that this is its own test case, but it 
could just be bundled with 164)
TC160: approved
TC162: approved (note that I get an error when I run it - no idea why)
TC164: approved - could add more common ones if we are really trying to 
discourage this behavior)


Note that in order to make these tests pass at all, an implementation 
MUST NOT implement the new proposed behavior of interpreting CURIEs with 
undefined prefixes as URIs - or it MUST implement it only on sources 
that are not clearly declaring themselves to be written using version 
1.0 of XHTML+RDFa (my implementation now switches on the DOCTYPE or 
@version).

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 16 November 2009 18:49:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:33 UTC