Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text regarding defining a prefix of '_'

Looks fine to me.

(I was unsure on the call and I checked: my implementation already does
that and issues a warning in case of reusing '_')

Thanks

ivan

Shane McCarron wrote:
> At the 12 November meeting, the group agreed that the RDFa Syntax
> Specification reserves the prefix of '_', but that it could be clearer
> about this.  We agreed to put a clarification in the Errata.  I propose
> the following text:
> 
> In sections 5.4.5 and 7 the specification indicates that the prefix '_'
> is reserved and is used to create / reference blank nodes (bnodes). 
> Because this prefix is reserved, authors SHOULD NOT declare a mapping
> for the prefix '_' and conforming processors MUST NOT incorporate such a
> prefix mapping into the 'list of URI mappings' as defined in section 5.5.
> 
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf