W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > May 2009

Re: [whatwg] Link rot is not dangerous

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:26:08 +0200
Message-ID: <4A13E8D0.8000307@gmx.de>
To: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
CC: 'Steven Pemberton' <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>, "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, 'Henri Sivonen' <hsivonen@iki.fi>, 'WHATWG Mailinglist' <whatwg@whatwg.org>, 'Dan Brickley' <danbri@danbri.org>, 'RDFa Developers' <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
> Following the URL to discover the semantic of properties is not only useful
> but can also be necessary for CURIE, e.g. when the author uses a paradoxical
> prefix just for the fun of it.  A language without CURIE would not expose
> the users to this necessity.
> If you have to CURIE, you have to FYN.
> Just my POV,
> Chris

CURIEs vs URI is only a syntactical difference; you don't need to FYN as 
long as you are happy with a URI as identifier.

BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 11:26:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 20 May 2009 11:26:53 GMT