W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > May 2009

RE: [whatwg] Link rot is not dangerous

From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:17:26 +0200
To: "'Steven Pemberton'" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>, "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "'Henri Sivonen'" <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: "'WHATWG Mailinglist'" <whatwg@whatwg.org>, "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@danbri.org>, "'RDFa Developers'" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6D716410430A46C29446E60F80CD6155@POCZTOWIEC>

Following the URL to discover the semantic of properties is not only useful
but can also be necessary for CURIE, e.g. when the author uses a paradoxical
prefix just for the fun of it.  A language without CURIE would not expose
the users to this necessity.
If you have to CURIE, you have to FYN.
Just my POV,
Chris

Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 11:18:59 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Reschke: "Re: [whatwg] Link rot is not dangerous"
Previous message: Steven Pemberton: "Re: [whatwg] Link rot is not dangerous"
In reply to: Steven Pemberton: "Re: [whatwg] Link rot is not dangerous"
Next in thread: Julian Reschke: "Re: [whatwg] Link rot is not dangerous"
Reply: Julian Reschke: "Re: [whatwg] Link rot is not dangerous"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 20 May 2009 11:19:00 GMT