Strictly speaking, surely there's no requirement that a RDF property URI be dereferenceable? (Though of course, it is nice if it does). Steven On Wed, 13 May 2009 16:54:34 +0200, Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de> wrote: > Sam Ruby wrote: >> Another comment worth forwarding: >> >> http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-May/019717.html > > Answering to that here so I don't have to subscribe to yet another > list... > > I think the namespace should actually be > http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/rdf.xml# since that is what they define > their terms under in rdf.xml. > > Regards, > Simon >Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 15:00:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 13 May 2009 15:00:58 GMT