- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:06:56 -0500
- To: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- CC: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Actually..... I cannot imagine a situation in which that would not be a requirement. This is a follow-your-nose architecture. If your nose hits a wall straight away, you are not going to be able to "learn" the meaning of terms. Steven Pemberton wrote: > Strictly speaking, surely there's no requirement that a RDF property > URI be dereferenceable? (Though of course, it is nice if it does). > > Steven > > On Wed, 13 May 2009 16:54:34 +0200, Simon Reinhardt > <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de> wrote: > >> Sam Ruby wrote: >>> Another comment worth forwarding: >>> http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-May/019717.html >>> >> >> Answering to that here so I don't have to subscribe to yet another >> list... >> >> I think the namespace should actually be >> http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/rdf.xml# since that is what they >> define their terms under in rdf.xml. >> >> Regards, >> Simon >> > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 15:07:41 UTC