Hi Julian, >> By the way, how is RDFa's use of @rel not backwards-compatible? > > It will conflict with the use of full URIs. Ah...you mean "forwards-compatible". As Ben said in another email, some people have a personal preference for full URIs, and no-one is going to say they shouldn't air their views. But given that at the time RDFa was created there was no HTML or XHTML standard that used @rel to hold a full URI -- and there still isn't -- it can only create unnecessary confusion if this personal preference is wrapped up an the false assertion that the RDFa standard has somehow created a 'legacy problem'. Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck, webBackplane mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, London, EC2A 4RR)Received on Monday, 26 January 2009 13:26:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 26 January 2009 13:26:42 GMT