- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:07:03 +0100
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Mark Birbeck wrote: > Hi Julian, > > I'm afraid it's the use of full URIs in @rel that is not backwards > compatible, as I explained, since it makes every value, such as "next" > or "foo", into a relative path. > > That in itself wouldn't be a problem except for the fact that you > can't have *both* predefined and user-defined values being relative > paths against the same base URI. You can, if you introduce a registry for the short names (such as the Atom feed format did). > By the way, how is RDFa's use of @rel not backwards-compatible? It will conflict with the use of full URIs. BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 26 January 2009 13:07:50 UTC