Good pointers Michael. For those of you concerned with validation, the advice in [4] is also good. If you want to conform to the current technology of using xmlns attributes to declare vocabulary mappings, it is perfectly safe to ignore those warnings from validators. Note that the use of '@prefix' that is described in that wiki page is not yet something that is blessed by anyone. Having said that, it is already supported in some of the implementations as sort of a proof of concept. [4] http://rdfa.info/wiki/RDFainHTML4#Validation_of_HTML_4_.2B_RDFa Michael Hausenblas wrote: > > Ed, > > True. We're working on it. Though I have not been deeply into HTML4/5 > recently, three sources come into mind immediately, see [1], [2] and [3]. > Does that help? > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://rdfa.info/wiki/RDFainHTML4 > [2] http://www.samaxes.com/2008/08/29/the-semantic-web-and-rdfa/ > [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Jan/0077.html > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.comReceived on Sunday, 25 January 2009 16:42:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 25 January 2009 16:42:06 GMT