W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace

From: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:57:49 +0000
Message-Id: <C957261C-4AF6-4B38-A1FC-DC5171813B2C@g5n.co.uk>
To: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Christoph Lange wrote:

> Hmm, I hope it's not getting to philosophical now ;-)  I'm sure  
> it's no longer
> related to Stéphane's original question, but nevertheless let me  
> ask: Wouldn't
> it, in some cases, be reasonable to make XML namespace URIs usable as
> vocabulary URIs?  What URI would, e.g., the xhtml:h1 element have  
> if you
> wanted to talk about it in RDF like …
>
> xhtml:h1
>     a :XHTMLElement ;
>     :content :text ;
>     ... .

Actually I had a very similar need. The choice was between using the  
XHTML namespace as-is, which would result in funny looking URIs like  
<http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtmlh1>; tacking an extra '#' on to the  
XHTML namespace; or defining my own URIs for XHTML elements.

In the end, I opted for the third solution:

	http://buzzword.org.uk/rdf/xhtml-elements#

The ultimate point of it being:

	http://buzzword.org.uk/rdf/sections#

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Sunday, 25 January 2009 08:58:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 25 January 2009 08:58:35 GMT