W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Holy grail

From: Sam Kuper <sam.kuper@uclmail.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:28:33 +0000
Message-ID: <4126b3450901080728h6a7b4598if260c65cff2332c0@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org

2009/1/8 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
>
> Ah. As I said, I never used Oxygen. Actually, this made me realize that
> Oxygen is not the only one having a problem; I use jEdit as my editor
> which does have a nice DTD dependent on-the-fly check of XML files
> indeed. But it always complains about the xmlns declarations in my
> XHTML+RDFa files, and I just learned to ignore those warnings:-(

Perhaps it's a matter of relativity whether it's Oxygen and jEdit
having the problems (and presumably other editors/validators too), or
the W3C Validator ;-). As Halindrome's (Shane's) post[1] states, "the
warnings are useless and INCORRECT when namespace support is required.
Since all XHTML family markup languages require namespace support, it
seemed logical to update the validator to also have this support -
albeit in a hackish manner."

While I can understand that the warnings are useless, and I recognise
Shane is probably right when he says they are incorrect, I haven't yet
found the place(s) in the W3C docs that state(s) they are incorrect.

For my own understanding, if anyone can point me to this place - or
these place(s) - I'd be grateful.

Many thanks again,

Sam

[1]http://www.oxygenxml.com/forum/topic2603-15.html#p11162
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2009 15:29:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 8 January 2009 15:29:15 GMT