Re: Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE?

Manu Sporny wrote:
> Just to see if this was just confusing me, or would confuse future
> implementers, I asked three of our engineers to briefly look at the
> CURIE section of the RDFa spec and state whether or not the following
> were valid CURIEs forms (Y means "Yes", N means "No", ? means "Don't know"):
>
> Y Y N prefix           (Correct answer: N)
> N N N prefix:          (Correct answer: Y) *current discussion topic
> Y Y Y prefix:reference (Correct answer: Y)
> N N N :                (Correct answer: N)
>   
I think the correct answer here is "yes".  it would mean the default 
prefix with no reference - or in RDFa http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com