On 18/2/09 16:26, Danny Ayers wrote: > I've just been told that the anecdote referred to below was in fact > completely false, so I'd like to unreservedly retract the comment. If anyone cares to read, much of the initial IMG discussion is in the Web, Marc: http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0182.html TimBL: http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0186.html see also http://info.cern.ch/NextBrowser1.html cheers, Dan > Thanks, > Danny. > > 2009/2/18 Danny Ayers<danny.ayers@gmail.com>: > >> Incidentally I'm reminded of a (quite probably spurious) anecdote I >> heard: when it was suggested that browsers display images, timbl >> responded by saying it'll only lead to people publishing porn. True or >> not, we know what happened. But it would be hard to argue that the >> ability to display images is a bad thing. >> >> Cheers, >> Danny. >> >> -- >> http://danny.ayers.name >> > > >Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2009 15:35:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 18 February 2009 15:35:12 GMT