Mark, Richard, Interesting discussion, thanks Mark for writing it up. I see Richard's point about how some designers' use of BASE makes adding RDFa more difficult... but I'm not sure we can do much about it, since BASE does define how to resolve all URLs on a page, and it would be odd to have one set of rules for @about, but a different one for @href, and we obviously can't modify how @href behaves. I seem to remember that one of our *goals* in setting @about="" on HEAD and not on HTML was, in fact, to enable the use of @typeof on HEAD to give the current URL a type without having to explicitly say about="". If you want a bnode, there are plenty of better places in the markup to make that happen. I'm not sure I see a strong enough reason for a change in the spec. I sympathize with Richard's example, but I think most of the complexity there is unavoidable given how BASE and @href already behave. I also sympathize with Mark's examples... except for @typeof on HEAD which I think we actually built that way for a reason :) -BenReceived on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 02:27:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 8 April 2009 02:27:05 GMT