W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2009

SKOS comment: name "broader" confusing

From: Barclay, Daniel <daniel@fgm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:19:18 -0400
Message-ID: <49DBA736.6090505@fgm.com>
To: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
The term skos:broader should be named with something less ambiguous than the
single word "broader."

Using just that single word is ambiguous, because statement "A skos:broader B"
sounds like it means "A is broader than B" just as much (or more, in fact) than
it sounds like it means "A has broader term B."

Using just the single work seems extremely likely to be error-prone, as people
reading or writing SKOS data (and/or tools) to struggle to remember whether
skos:broader is defined to mean the former or to mean the latter.


The name should contain something that indicates the direction of the
relationship (the way "subclassOf" uses the word "of," or something like
"hasPart" uses the word "has).


Something like "hasBroaderTerm" would be clear, but presumably is wordier than
preferred.  If the sense were reversed, "broaderThan" would be shorter and
just as clear.



Daniel
-- 
(Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft Exchange.) [F]
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 19:20:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 April 2009 19:20:08 GMT