W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > October 2008

Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1

From: Azamat <abdoul@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:13:14 +0300
Message-ID: <006401c92854$8beb3020$a104810a@homepc>
To: "Toby A Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Cc: "'SW-forum'" <semantic-web@w3.org>, <metadataportals@yahoo.com>, <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Toby,
I wonder why all taxonomic groups are under the property heading instead of 
the class heading. Thanks.
Azamat
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Toby A Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk>
To: <metadataportals@yahoo.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>; "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 1:08 AM
Subject: Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1


>
> On 4 Oct 2008, at 02:41, Sw-MetaPortal-ProjectParadigm wrote:
>
>> Check out www.ubio.org and review the underlying structure. Use  this and 
>> contact the developers network to expand  the biological  taxonomy 
>> vocabulary.
>
> Thanks for the information. I'll try to get in touch with them soon.  As 
> it happens, today I've pushed a few changes across from my working  copy 
> to the live vocab:
>
> http://purl.org/NET/biol/ns#
>
> These changes make biol:hasTaxonomy into a sub-property of rdf:type  and 
> biol:Taxonomy a sub-class of rdfs:Class. It also adds a new term 
> biol:morePrecise for linking from a Taxonomy to a more precise  Taxonomy. 
> Examples 3.7 and 3.8 are new, and demonstrate these new  features.
>
> Lastly, having looked at ubio.org as you suggested, I've made  biol:rank 
> into a sub-property of ubio:taxonomicGroup, but having not  been able to 
> find an RDFS file for ubio, I'm not 100% sure this is  correct, so it is 
> at risk of reversal.
>
> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>
>
> 
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2008 08:14:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 October 2008 08:14:05 GMT