Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221

Ben Adida schrieb:
> 
> 
> Johannes,
> 
> You had raised an issue (ISSUE-91) as follows:
> 
>> A. Other XML Languages
>>
>> "If a language includes @xml:base [XMLBASE], an RDFa parser for that 
>> host language must process it, and use its value to set [base]."
>> Is this a requirement? The section is marked "informative".
> 
> As per our last telecon [1], we have agreed to the following resolution:
> 
> "we remove the xml:base example, and move the xml:base description 
> (minus example) into the main text, removing appendix A."

So @xml:base MUST be processed for languages including @xml:base? OK

-- 
Johannes Koch
In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum.
                             (Te Deum, 4th cent.)