Ben Adida wrote: > > On Mar 7, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Manu Sporny wrote: > >> - A clean/simple website directing people to various RDFa resources - >> like rdfa.info - but cleaner and less generic. > > Let's make sure it stays rdfa.info. We can improve the design if we have > time, although I think that's not the first priority. > > -Ben One thing I would like to suggest, If you are going to be updating the rdfa.info site, could you modify the template to include RDFa statements? A couple of months back, when I decided I wanted to annotate my Wordpress blog with RDFa, the first place I looked for good "in the wild" examples was the rdfa.info site. I was a little disappointed that it didn't "eat it's own dog food". It really wasn't that hard to modify my template to include SIOC data in RDFa. (Would have been easier had I had a better understanding of RDFa at the time) Having a public example like that would make it easy for potential adopters to see what needs to be done. A wiki page or a blog post explaining the process would make it that much better. Daniel E. Renfer http://kronkltd.net/Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 17:51:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 March 2008 17:51:14 GMT