- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 07:24:26 -0600
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Ben Adida wrote: > > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/91 > > Read and respond with +1 or -1 and explanation. This one is a quickie. > > We have the following language: > > ====== > A. Other XML Languages > > "If a language includes @xml:base [XMLBASE], an RDFa parser for that > host language must process it, and use its value to set [base]." +1 > ====== > > The comment is that we shouldn't state a MUST for anything other than > XHTML1.1+RDFa. > > PROPOSED RESOLUTION: change wording to: > > "If an XML dialect that supports @xml:base eventually implements RDFa, > the RDFa parser for that host language will likely process @xml:base > and use its value to set [base]." > > > -Ben -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 13:25:04 UTC