W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2008

Re: quick one: ISSUE-91

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:06:02 +0000
Message-ID: <a707f8300803040606j1dd70942x5f0a73be638acbb@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Hi Ben,

I've actually gone -1 on this, because I just wonder if we shouldn't
delete the paragraph altogether. A few people have been confused by
this, and it's a little bit of a relic.

Regards,

Mark

On 04/03/2008, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
>
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/91
>
>  Read and respond with +1 or -1 and explanation. This one is a quickie.
>
>  We have the following language:
>
>  ======
>  A. Other XML Languages
>
>  "If a language includes @xml:base [XMLBASE], an RDFa parser for that
>  host language must process it, and use its value to set [base]."
>  ======
>
>  The comment is that we shouldn't state a MUST for anything other than
>  XHTML1.1+RDFa.
>
>  PROPOSED RESOLUTION: change wording to:
>
>  "If an XML dialect that supports @xml:base eventually implements RDFa,
>  the RDFa parser for that host language will likely process @xml:base and
>  use its value to set [base]."
>
>
>
>  -Ben
>
>


-- 
  Mark Birbeck

  mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.x-port.net | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  x-port.net Ltd. is registered in England and Wales, number 03730711
  The registered office is at:

    2nd Floor
    Titchfield House
    69-85 Tabernacle Street
    London
    EC2A 4RR
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:06:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:06:15 GMT