- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:26:15 -0400
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
OK, then please make sure that Appendix B of the RDFa Syntax and Processing spec has definite statements about the value spaces of BOTH of your new datatypes, CURIE and URIorSafeCURIE. Being especially clear on the difference between the QName and CURIE value spaces, and the similarities or differences betweeen anyURI and URIorSafeCURIE value spaces, in this part of the document, seems pretty important. Not that I understand this stuff all that well, but there seems to be so much potential for confusion that I don't think you can overdo the explanations here. Jonathan On Jun 16, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Shane McCarron wrote: > Jonathan Rees wrote: >> >> On Jun 16, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Shane McCarron wrote: >> >>> Sorry, I misunderstood your request. We have defined the lexical >>> and value space for CURIEs in the CURIE spec itself (http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts#curie >>> for the latest draft). For a variety of reasons the RDFa spec >>> does not reference the CURIE spec. If I understand your request, >>> you would like the text about CURIE lexical and value space copied >>> into the RDFa specification. Is that correct? >> >> I found nothing relevant in Appendix A here: >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-curie-20080506 >> >> so I'm not sure what you're talking about. > Agreed - the definition of those spaces is in the normative section > 3, and is stated as: > >> The concatenation of the prefix value associated with a CURIE and >> its |reference| MUST be an IRI (as defined by the IRI production in >> [IRI <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-curie-20080506/#ref_IRI>]). Note >> that while the set of IRIs represents the /lexical space/ of a >> CURIE, the /value space/ is the set of URIs (IRIs after >> canonicalization - see [IRI <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-curie-20080506/#ref_IRI >> >]). > >> >> Whether either document can cite the other depends on their >> publication schedule. I don't advise having a recommendation cite a >> draft. > Quite. The publication schedules are disjoint, which is one of the > reasons the two are not coupled together. > > -- > Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > >
Received on Monday, 16 June 2008 15:26:53 UTC