- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:32:46 -0500
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Jonathan Rees wrote: > > > On Jun 16, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Shane McCarron wrote: > >> Sorry, I misunderstood your request. We have defined the lexical and >> value space for CURIEs in the CURIE spec itself >> (http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts#curie for the latest draft). For a >> variety of reasons the RDFa spec does not reference the CURIE spec. >> If I understand your request, you would like the text about CURIE >> lexical and value space copied into the RDFa specification. Is that >> correct? >> > > I found nothing relevant in Appendix A here: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-curie-20080506 > > so I'm not sure what you're talking about. Agreed - the definition of those spaces is in the normative section 3, and is stated as: > The concatenation of the prefix value associated with a CURIE and its > |reference| MUST be an IRI (as defined by the IRI production in [IRI > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-curie-20080506/#ref_IRI>]). Note that > while the set of IRIs represents the /lexical space/ of a CURIE, the > /value space/ is the set of URIs (IRIs after canonicalization - see > [IRI <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-curie-20080506/#ref_IRI>]). > > Whether either document can cite the other depends on their > publication schedule. I don't advise having a recommendation cite a > draft. Quite. The publication schedules are disjoint, which is one of the reasons the two are not coupled together. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 16 June 2008 14:33:36 UTC