W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2008

Re: [RDFa] CR for RDFa

From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:20:29 -0400
Message-ID: <f032cc060806110520o3c150cdcn2b97ec4e3604aef8@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
Cc: "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

I diffed the June 9th [1] and April 22nd [2] versions of the RDFa
Primer and am happy with the changes. The Primer is a very readable
and useful document--I've even heard this from other people at $work.
Congratulations on advancing RDFa another step forward.

//Ed

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080609/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080422/

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
>
>
> Members of the SWD and XHTML2 WGs,
>
> (First, regrets for tomorrow's telecon, I will be at Yahoo giving a tutorial
> on... RDFa, what else?)
>
> We would like to ask both working groups to submit the RDFa in XHTML 1.1
> specification for advancement to Candidate Recommendation. Given that the
> timing works well, we would also like to ask members of the WGs to approve
> the latest RDFa Primer for publication.
>
> -Ben
> chair, RDFa Task Force
>
> =====================================
>
> RDFa in XHTML 1.1 Syntax
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/CR-rdfa-syntax-20080612
>
> Diff from February Last Call Draft:
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/CR-rdfa-syntax-20080612/rdfa-syntax-diff.html
>
> Test Cases
> http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/rdfa-test-harness/
> (undergoing last tweaks because of SPARQL engines inconsistencies)
>
> Implementation Report:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/implementation-report/
> (will be updated as we evaluate all implementations during CR)
>
> Disposition of Comments: currently working on this document from XML dump
> from the tracker.
>
> All closed issues can be found at
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/closed
> starting with the text "Last Call Comment:"
>
> Two open issues are at
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/products/2
> (they have been addressed in our telecons, we're just waiting for a response
> from folks who brought up the two issues.)
>
>
> None of the issues have resulted in formal objections.
>
>
> RDFa Primer:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080609/
>
> RDFa Primer previous draft (the one on which comments were received):
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080422/
>
> Comments on the Primer:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0157.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0106.html
>
> Response to Comments:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0176.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0172.html
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 12:21:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 11 June 2008 12:21:10 GMT