W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > February 2008

RE: Small problem with... test harness? SPARQL processor?

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:48:54 +0100
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852015307C3@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: "W3C RDFa task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>



> P.S. One tiny feature request to the test harness: would it 
> be possible to add a link to each individual test file from the test 
> harness itself? 

My 2c:

The easiest would be to link to the TC itself. 
There is a rewrite active, so that if you enter

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0001

into your browser, the TC manifest is queried and the according test is
rendered.

Cheers,
	Michael

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
 Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
---------------------------------------------------------- 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> Ivan Herman
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 1:11 PM
> To: Manu Sporny; W3C RDFa task force
> Subject: Small problem with... test harness? SPARQL processor?
> 
> Hi Manu,
> 
> I just wonder whether you already have an experience with this...
> 
> I installed my latest version of pyRdfa distiller which 
> corresponds to the Last Call version. I ran the test harness 
> and I got an error on tests #1, #29, #51. Well... what is 
> weird is that if I run the test harness through Virtuoso, 
> then this is what I get; if I use sparqler, the #1 is fine, 
> and #29 and #51 are still errors.
> 
> The weird thing is: I have no idea what the issue might be: 
> 'visually' 
> the generated RDF by distiller seems to be o.k. And: all 
> three tests are related to the issue of literal normalization 
> (well, of non-normalization), this is the new thing related 
> to previous versions.
> 
> I wonder whether you already changed your implementation and 
> you had (or
> not) experiences with it. I also wonder whether this is not 
> something where we might have problems with the way sparql 
> processors compare strings; with the non-normalized versions 
> we have now I am not sure what exactly happens:-( (Which 
> might also explain why virtuoso and sparqler behave differently...)
> 
> Ivan
> 
> P.S. One tiny feature request to the test harness: would it 
> be possible 
> to add a link to each individual test file from the test 
> harness itself? 
> When I get an 'error' I would of course like to see what the 
> error is; 
> if I get the URI of the test file itself (ie, the xhtml file) I can 
> continue with testing right away, whereas I have to locate that file 
> first now...
> 
> -- 
> 
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2008 12:49:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 21 February 2008 12:49:11 GMT