- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:28:07 +0100
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <47AC20A7.4080103@w3.org>
Ben, again, I was following Mark's lead on this: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jan/0306.html see his comment on my comments on test #63 I do not really have strong feelings neither pro or con, the main issue I am interested in is to have this clearly defined:-) Ivan Ben Adida wrote: > > > Hi all, > > So I'm trying out my parser on test case 87, which tests the following: > > <a rel=":alternate" href="http://example.org/alternate">alternate</a> > <a rel=":appendix" href="http://example.org/appendix">appendix</a> > ... > > and other reserved words prefixed with just ":". Now the test says that > these should resolve to vocab#alternate, vocab#appendix, etc... > > Except, the top of the XHTML document contains: > > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> > > And since I'm processing xmlns statements, whatever default CURIE > namespace I put in gets overridden by the document itself. > > Is it really the right thing to say "parse xmlns declarations *except* > for the default namespace one, which is always vocab#?" > > this obviously shouldn't affect rel="license", since we do that with > pre-processing special-casing anyways, but I didn't expect that > rel=":license" would also require special-casing. > > Thoughts? > > -Ben > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 09:28:07 UTC