W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Changing @instanceof to @typeof

From: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:39:04 -0400
Message-ID: <47F64B98.8020801@torrez.us>
To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Niklas Lindström wrote:
> Hello,
> is it only me (and Ralph it seems in the minutes) who find @typeof
> directionally wrong? Why not @oftype or @hastype?
> A superficial reading make it seem as "instance" was replaced by its
> exact inverse: "type", which obviously cannot mean the same thing. Or
> am I just misinterpreting how @typeof should be read?
> (Part of the thinking of "instanceof" was based on the N3 shorthand
> "is ... of", which is N3:s version of @rev. N3 also has "has" as
> syntax sugar for e.g. '<#me> has foaf:name "Niklas".', why I suggested
> @hastype last year [1]. Along with @a. ;) )
> Best regards,
> Niklas

@a sounds perfect to me.

Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 15:39:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:27 UTC