- From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:15:02 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org,public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
ISSUE-116: Last Call Comment: use CURIE prefix other than xmlns for future HTML compatibility http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/116 Raised by: Ben Adida On product: RDFa raised by PFWG in [1] """ 2.5 RDFa in HTML documents This specification does not address using RDFa in HTML documents (only for XHTML documents). While most of the specification could also be applied to HTML documents, the mapping of CURIE prefixes will have to be rewritten for HTML documents (since there is no namespace concept in HTML). This and the complexity problem mentioned in 2.4 make us wonder if the concept of CURIEs should be modified to not use the “xmlns:[prefix]” attribute for prefix mapping. Have you considered alternatives that would allow a consistent use of RDFa in HTML and XHTML documents? From the perspective of accessibility, consistency between HTML and XHTML documents should be a goal of the specification. """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0031.html
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 17:15:38 UTC