Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)

Hi Ivan,

> In any case, you should also update the document at
>
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-rdfa-syntax-20070921/#s_rdfaindetail
>
> to make it consistent.

Do you mean the XHTML namespace declaration? I've purposely avoided
changing the XHTML namespace. I got round the need to do that by using
the idea of the 'default prefix mapping', and making the mapping the
XHTML namespace _plus_ the fragment identifier.

Of course, we can debate whether we should also change the XHTML
namespace to be the same, but that is probably outside the scope of
this taskforce, so I thought the way that I hdd done it would stop us
from being dependent on a decision on that issue.

(If you are referring to something else in that section then I
apologise for the misunderstanding, and perhaps you could point it
out. Thanks.)

Regards,

Mark

-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.

Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2007 09:35:31 UTC