- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:14:48 +0100
- To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Cc: W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4724FBC8.50503@w3.org>
Sure. Any thoughts (you or anybody else) on the #0050 issue, though? Ivan (On his way back home, using the wireless in the NW lounge at Logan airport in Boston. B.t.w.: they have now a free wireless!:-) Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > Ivan, > > Thanks. I'll add it to the Test Suite as soon as I'm back in office > (currently at Whistler/Canada with a flaky wireless connection :) > from 5 Nov on ... > > Cheers, > Michael > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Michael Hausenblas, MSc. > Institute of Information Systems & Information Management > JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH > Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA > ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] >> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 12:49 PM >> To: Hausenblas, Michael >> Cc: W3C RDFa task force >> Subject: Yet another instanceof test >> >> Michael, >> >> I attach yet another test that I believe addresses an issue >> not covered by the others. We had a discussion at some point >> on the list, and got to an agreement, that an 'instanceof' >> placed on the <html> element would automatically generate a >> type for the whole document by virtue of the fact that there >> is an implicit @about="" on the <html>. >> >> I am not sure that is crystal clear from the syntax document, >> although the initialization of the processing steps seems to >> refer to that. >> >> So I have a test that does that. >> >> I did not know what name you will give to the test, so the >> SPARQL file may have to be adapted. >> >> B.t.w. there is relationship of this feature with test #0050 >> which deals >> with: >> >> <p instanceof="b:c">...</p> >> >> ie, what happens if the @instanceof is alone. _I know_ it is >> not the same processing-wise if we say that there is an >> implicit @about="" on <html> via some sort of a preprocessing >> step (hm, I used the 'p' word, sorry about that:-) but for >> the user it surely looks the same. On the other hand, the >> approved behaviour of #0050 is to create a blank node and >> apply @rdf:type on that one, rather than on the inherited context. >> >> Either we should make that extra @about on <html> much more >> explicit in the text (maybe with a separate example) or maybe >> we have to come back on the #0050 case. The former is >> obviously easier:-) >> >> Thanks >> >> Ivan >> -- >> >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2007 21:47:31 UTC