RE: Yet another instanceof test

Ivan,

Thanks. I'll add it to the Test Suite as soon as I'm back in office
(currently at Whistler/Canada with a flaky wireless connection :)
from 5 Nov on ...

Cheers,
	Michael

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
 Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
---------------------------------------------------------- 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] 
> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 12:49 PM
> To: Hausenblas, Michael
> Cc: W3C RDFa task force
> Subject: Yet another instanceof test
> 
> Michael,
> 
> I attach yet another test that I believe addresses an issue 
> not covered by the others. We had a discussion at some point 
> on the list, and got to an agreement, that an 'instanceof' 
> placed on the <html> element would automatically generate a 
> type for the whole document by virtue of the fact that there 
> is an implicit @about="" on the <html>.
> 
> I am not sure that is crystal clear from the syntax document, 
> although the initialization of the processing steps seems to 
> refer to that.
> 
> So I have a test that does that.
> 
> I did not know what name you will give to the test, so the 
> SPARQL file may have to be adapted.
> 
> B.t.w. there is relationship of this feature with test #0050 
> which deals
> with:
> 
> <p instanceof="b:c">...</p>
> 
> ie, what happens if the @instanceof is alone. _I know_ it is 
> not the same processing-wise if we say that there is an 
> implicit @about="" on <html> via some sort of a preprocessing 
> step (hm, I used the 'p' word, sorry about that:-) but for 
> the user it surely looks the same. On the other hand, the 
> approved behaviour of #0050 is to create a blank node and 
> apply @rdf:type on that one, rather than on the inherited context.
> 
> Either we should make that extra @about on <html> much more 
> explicit in the text (maybe with a separate example) or maybe 
> we have to come back on the #0050 case. The former is 
> obviously easier:-)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Ivan
> -- 
> 
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>

Received on Sunday, 28 October 2007 19:44:35 UTC