Hi Benjamin, > ... but for now RDFa is at least a clear winner against RDF/XML > (seriously, RDFa is a great replacement syntax for RDF/XML graph > serializations, as it's both human and machine readable and > allows browsing between graphs when each graph is serialized > as a stand-alone RDFa document. That's a huge use case, too) Obviously the real test of that is yet to come..but I do agree with you. :) You've reminded me as well, that I saw an interesting use-case last year where someone was using RDFa to add metadata to RDF/XML documents! I don't recall the specific requirement, but it would be interesting to track it down. Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com standards. innovation.Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:10:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:17 GMT