- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:06:45 +0100
- To: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Cc: "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, <www-qa@w3.org>
All,
To enable a smooth and reliable process regarding the
handling of RDFa TC, I'd like to suggest the following:
1. We (RDFa-TF) define the role of a 'TC responsible' (TCR)
that is the process owner for all TC-related issues
2. In case a (not yet covered) feature is expected
to be tested, anyone may send a mail with a short
description to either:
+ this list (public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org) using
[RDFa-TC] as a prefix OR
+ public-rdfa-test@w3.org (yet to be established)
We should agree on ONE of the two options :)
3. The TCR is then responsible for ...
+ raising an according issue (in Tracker), and
+ getting the new TC onto the next telecon's agenda
for discussion
4. The fallback for the TCR is the TF chair.
Even though this might sound like a bit of an overkill,
IMHO it is a good thing to define at least an ideal
process that we can refer to and people know what to
expect.
I'd be _very_ happy if we can agree on this process
(or an adapted version) ASAP, to start doing so; cf.
for example DanC's request w.r.t. TC [1].
Note: w3.org seems to be down at the time writing,
so please be lenient towards me that I did
not include references as usual ...
Cheers,
Michael
BTW: I volunteer to initially fill the TCR role ;)
[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000002.htm
----------------------------------------------------------
Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
<office>
phone: +43-316-876-1193 (fax:-1191)
e-mail: michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at
web: http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
<private>
mobile: +43-660-7621761
web: http://www.sw-app.org/
----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 09:02:02 UTC