I'm in the 'instanceof' crowd too. :) (Just back from a vacation, got some catching up to do.) Best regards, Niklas On 7/17/07, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > > Diego Berrueta wrote: > > El mar, 17-07-2007 a las 09:06 +0200, Thomas Baker escribió: > >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:00:46AM +0200, Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > >>>> Everyone else on the list: time to express an opinion on which > >>>> attribute > >>>> name you'd like, ASAP :) > >>> I already opted for 'instanceOf' [1] ;) > >> +1 'instanceof' > > > > +1 for "instanceof" too. > > > > IMHO, "isa" might introduce some confusion, because some communities use > > "is-a" for subclassing, not instantiation. > > > > That is a good point! Thanks Diego. I hereby withdraw any backing for > 'isa' and join the 'instanceof' crowd... > > Ivan > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > >Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:47:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:08 GMT