- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:47:24 +0200
- To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: "Diego Berrueta" <diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org>, "Thomas Baker" <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>, "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>, "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
I'm in the 'instanceof' crowd too. :) (Just back from a vacation, got some catching up to do.) Best regards, Niklas On 7/17/07, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > > Diego Berrueta wrote: > > El mar, 17-07-2007 a las 09:06 +0200, Thomas Baker escribió: > >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:00:46AM +0200, Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > >>>> Everyone else on the list: time to express an opinion on which > >>>> attribute > >>>> name you'd like, ASAP :) > >>> I already opted for 'instanceOf' [1] ;) > >> +1 'instanceof' > > > > +1 for "instanceof" too. > > > > IMHO, "isa" might introduce some confusion, because some communities use > > "is-a" for subclassing, not instantiation. > > > > That is a good point! Thanks Diego. I hereby withdraw any backing for > 'isa' and join the 'instanceof' crowd... > > Ivan > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:47:27 UTC