W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > July 2007

Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:46:11 +0100
Message-ID: <640dd5060707091446u6f527e9bjc5f0bf41854379b1@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>

Hi Ben,

Sounds good.

Just for those who weren't present, do you mind if I just explain what
"no changes to content model" means? It's simply that we're no longer
going to have the slight modifications to HTML/XHTML syntax for <link>
and <meta> that we had before. In other words, the following is not
going to be used, at least for the time being:

  <meta property="p">o</meta>

Regards,

Mark

On 09/07/07, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> At the last telecon, we resolved that ISSUE-9 would be closed with a
> slightly more complete approach to LINK and META in XHTML1.1+RDFa,
> specifically that:
>
> "LINK and META appear only in HEAD with no changes to content model"
>
> which means no nested LINK and META in XHTML1.1, although XHTML2 is
> poised to change that (but that's not the issue of this group for now.)
>
> Any issues with this from folks who couldn't make the call? Any
> objections? I'll mark this closed during the call on Thursday if no one
> objects by then.
>
> -Ben
>
>
>


-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.
Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 21:46:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:08 GMT