W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > January 2007

Re: [RDFa] Re: Comment on Use Case #1 (structured blogging):

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:59:26 -0600
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1170172766.1376.348.camel@dirk>

On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 10:44 -0500, Ben Adida wrote:
> 
> Ivan,
> 
> I think I disagree with you on this point.
> 
> Ivan Herman wrote:
> > I think that people amy contest the validity of this use case, at least
> > the way it is formulated in terms of 'blogging'.
> 
> This is actually a very important goal: to have a blogging use case.

I also think structured blogging is an important use case; perhaps
I read Ivan's comment too quickly, but I don't see an argument
for not talking about structured blogging in an RDFa use case
document.

It's not like this is only a theoretical possibility... people
are doing this already, more or less.

My grddl bookmarks include several examples of this; some
are RDFa and some are GRDDL and some are both...

http://www.snee.com/bobdc.blog/2007/01/generating_rdfa_from_movable_t.html
http://code.google.com/p/brightcontent/
http://dezinformacja.org/tarpit/archiwum/erdf_w_blogu
 -- http://del.icio.us/connolly/grddl?setcount=100



p.s. can we please not rely on use case numbers in email subject
headers?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 15:59:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:03 GMT