- From: Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:51:38 +0100
- To: "olivier Thereaux" <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: ben@adida.net, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Dear Oliver, Ben and all, > Hello Ben, > > You wrote: > > There's a bright side to this, though: he likes the RDFa syntax and he > > says "if you don't care about validation...." which is exactly right > > until we have an XHTML 1.1 module validator. > > Somebody pointed me to this thread and I am curious to learn more > about this. > > I think indeed, the ability to validate XHTML with RDFa content will > be a good push for its adoption, but I am not sure I understand what > you mean by "an XHTML 1.1 module validator". Do you mean that you are > working on an RDFa module using XHTML 1.1 Modularization techniques, > and/or a profile for XHTML+RDFa (or indeed XHTML+XForms+SVG+MathML > +RDFa, as done in e.g. [1])? Or that there is a tool in the works for > it? In my humble opition I think that both solution are great, expecially a profile like XHTML+SVG+MathML [1] can be useful. Also for give a fast way to identify diffusion by checking DTD. I don't hope that Validator [2] has also statistical purposes (but it can be useful for stats on standards diffusion [3]). We may also consider to ask User Agents to downlaod particular DTD. Actually not all User Agents download these DTD but use a cached DTD taken, probably, from w3.org site. Regards, Simone > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/ [2] http://validator.w3.org [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-evangelist/2006Feb/0002.html
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 11:51:47 UTC