W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > February 2007

Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!

From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:11:26 +0900
Message-Id: <302F2DE1-CF94-4E03-BAC2-6C90BC0B7D1E@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
To: ben@adida.net

Hello Ben,

You wrote:
> There's a bright side to this, though: he likes the RDFa syntax and he
> says "if you don't care about validation...." which is exactly right
> until we have an XHTML 1.1 module validator.

Somebody pointed me to this thread and I am curious to learn more  
about this.

I think indeed, the ability to validate XHTML with RDFa content will  
be a good push for its adoption, but I am not sure I understand what  
you mean by "an XHTML 1.1 module validator". Do you mean that you are  
working on an RDFa module  using XHTML 1.1 Modularization techniques,  
and/or a profile for XHTML+RDFa (or indeed XHTML+XForms+SVG+MathML 
+RDFa, as done in e.g. [1])? Or that there is a tool in the works for  
it?

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/

Apologies if this is a FAQ, if so, a pointer would be appreciated.

Thank you,
olivier.
-- 
olivier Thereaux - W3C - http://www.w3.org/People/olivier/
W3C Open Source Software: http://www.w3.org/Status
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 03:11:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:03 GMT