W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > December 2007

Re: Reserved values for @rel and @rev

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:39:19 -0600
Message-ID: <475F1197.1030602@aptest.com>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
CC: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>, "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

It is in scope because we define a proscriptive list of values for 
@rel/@rev and other (unscoped) values are not valid / do not produce 
triples.  However, if people feel that it is inappropriate to make that 
a legal value in conforming XHTML+RDFa documents, I will let it drop.

Ben Adida wrote:
> Shane McCarron wrote:
>> I guess I was proposing "transformation" in the XHTML vocab# space is
>> because the already use it and they are a REC.  I don't think we should
>> second guess their choice, but with our current language for XHTML 2 and
>> XHTML+RDFa their value would be invalid.  And that seems
>> counter-productive.
> Except they use it *only* when there's a GRDDL @profile, and I'm pretty
> sure DanC would say that it shouldn't mean anything without a @profile
> (follow-your-nose.)
> Also, why is this in scope?
> -Ben

Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 22:39:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:25 UTC