- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:10:39 +0000
- To: "Thomas Baker" <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Thomas, The resolution from that meeting was actually to decouple the RDFa and CURIEs specifications. The part you are linking to about making a decision in December appeared earlier in the discussion, before that decision was made. Regards, Mark On 10/12/2007, Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: > > In Amsterdam, it was noted [1] that a decision needed to be > taken in December on whether to keep the section on CURIEs > [2] in the spec or not. I see that in the meantime, CURIE > Syntax 1.0 has been released [3]. > > What is the current plan? > > Tom > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-irc#T07-52-52 > [2] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-rdfa-syntax-20070927/#s_curies > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-curie-20071126/ > > -- > Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de> > W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/ > > > -- Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com standards. innovation.
Received on Monday, 10 December 2007 14:10:51 UTC