W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > December 2007

Re: CURIE section in syntax spec

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:10:39 +0000
Message-ID: <a707f8300712100610o6165bbedx775326bfb4008eba@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Thomas Baker" <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Hi Thomas,

The resolution from that meeting was actually to decouple the RDFa and
CURIEs specifications. The part you are linking to about making a
decision in December appeared earlier in the discussion, before that
decision was made.

Regards,

Mark

On 10/12/2007, Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
>
> In Amsterdam, it was noted [1] that a decision needed to be
> taken in December on whether to keep the section on CURIEs
> [2] in the spec or not.  I see that in the meantime, CURIE
> Syntax 1.0 has been released [3].
>
> What is the current plan?
>
> Tom
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-irc#T07-52-52
> [2] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-rdfa-syntax-20070927/#s_curies
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-curie-20071126/
>
> --
> Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
> W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/
>
>
>


-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.
Received on Monday, 10 December 2007 14:10:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:19 GMT