W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > December 2007

Re: CURIE section in syntax spec

From: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:34:28 +0100
To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20071210143428.GC3580@octavius>

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 02:10:39PM +0000, Mark Birbeck wrote:
> The resolution from that meeting was actually to decouple the RDFa and
> CURIEs specifications. The part you are linking to about making a
> decision in December appeared earlier in the discussion, before that
> decision was made.

My understanding was in fact that the specifications would
be decoupled - I just wanted to confirm that the release of [3]
has not changed those plans.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mark
> 
> On 10/12/2007, Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
> >
> > In Amsterdam, it was noted [1] that a decision needed to be
> > taken in December on whether to keep the section on CURIEs
> > [2] in the spec or not.  I see that in the meantime, CURIE
> > Syntax 1.0 has been released [3].
> >
> > What is the current plan?
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-irc#T07-52-52
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-rdfa-syntax-20070927/#s_curies
> > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-curie-20071126/
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
> > W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
>   Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer
> 
>   mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
>   http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com
> 
>   standards. innovation.

-- 
Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/
Received on Monday, 10 December 2007 14:36:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:19 GMT