W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > December 2007

Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE

From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:52:22 +0000
Message-ID: <b6bb4d890712030752x10b7a4f2k1de68d00c17fd962@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org

On Dec 3, 2007 6:41 AM, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote:

> GRDDL suggests the use of profile.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#grddl-xhtml
>    <head profile="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view">

You can use profile values *other* than that in GRDDL documents, which
is what I was assuming RDFa would be doing. The profile document just
has to use the following mechanism:


And then you'd end up with something like the following:

   <head profile="http://www.w3.org/ns/rdfa">

I've seen one profile floating about for RDFa, but I don't think that
will be endorsed by the group since it wasn't a www.w3.org URI. It'd
be nice to know what is going to be used, to make early adoption
easier. We all await the next draft.

> * You have to be able to edit head, which is impossible in many
> scenarios. Being able to point to another file locally would be cool.

That doesn't matter since, as Shane points out, XHTML + RDFa documents
require a DOCTYPE declaration at the top of the file. If you can add
that, you can add @profile.

Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Monday, 3 December 2007 15:53:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:25 UTC