Re: Understanding 'chaining'

Mark Birbeck wrote:
>
> As we know, this already works in the rules we have, but as you can
> see--following on from your comment--if an @about were to be placed in
> the hierarchy, with the intention of 'naming' one of the previously
> unnamed OWL classes, the current rules mean that the whole structure
> would collapse:

I'm sold. Let's build this and make sure that the edge cases work.

I'll update my parser this week.

-Ben