Re: Feedback on RDFa Primer

FWIW, I agree that a brief explanation of what an RDF triple is would be 
good.  I came into this knowing literally nothing about RDF and was lost 
for quite a while.

Ben Adida wrote:
> Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
>   
>> Mark,
>>
>>     
>>> One last thing is that I think we need a few graphics in 
>>> there. I wish I could draw, because I think RDFa could be 
>>> explained visually, *very* easily.
>>>       
>> I volunteer to draw, if you tell me WHAT to draw :)
>>     
>
> This is a good idea.
>
> Let's agree on the general outline and then I think the nature of the
> figure(s) needed will be much clearer.
>
> But let's also not do what we've done too often, which is to start from
> scratch. Let's restructure things slightly, cut down on needless
> verbiage, keep enough HTML examples, and sprinkle just enough of a
> description of RDF triples to make sure beginners aren't lost (they
> could get lost because of too little or too much.)
>
> -Ben
>   

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com