W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > August 2007

Re: question on the RDFa validation service...

From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:53:17 +0200
Message-ID: <cf8107640708080753w666b1edbg759bbd6f68b1a549@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Cc: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, "W3C RDFa task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Same here. Thanks Michael for the clarification. I was a little
surprised though, since RDFa isn't a recommendation, to see it appear.
As long as it only validates that which is reasonably set in stone by
now (which it seems), I guess it is fine.

Of course, my complaint about not seeing "XHTML plus RDFa" in the
dropdown can be disregarded - at least that should really not be
present until recommendation, right?

Best regards,
Niklas


On 8/8/07, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> Yes, I use
>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN"
> "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd">
>
> which is listed on the wiki page. So it is a problem with the DTD...
>
> Ivan
>
> Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> > Ivan,
> >
> > Not sure if I understand correctly. Are you talking about XHTML
> > validation [1]?
> > If yes, [2] is a good place to look at ...
> >
> > Regarding the DTD: I can't really help, sorry - Shane?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >       Michael
> >
> > [1] http://validator.w3.org/
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaInHTML
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >  Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
> >  Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
> >  JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
> >
> >  http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 2:48 PM
> >> To: Hausenblas, Michael
> >> Cc: W3C RDFa task force
> >> Subject: question on the RDFa validation service...
> >>
> >> Michael,
> >>
> >> I tried to get my files validate with RDFa. I ran into some small
> >> problems. I wonder whether it is easy to fix (some obviously yes...):
> >>
> >> - the 'instanceof' and 'resource' attributes are missing. I know, these
> >> are relatively new entries...
> >>
> >> - I am not sure what the original DTD was, but it looks like
> >> you started
> >> with Strict. However... I do get error messages because I use:
> >>
> >> <a id="something" name="something">...
> >>
> >> usage of 'name' is accepted in XHTML1 (afaik it is planned to
> >> be removed
> >>from XHTML2, but that is besides the point now). Your DTD does not seem
> >> to allow it. The same holds for 'lang': it seems to require 'xml:lang'.
> >>
> >> Would it be easy to fix these?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Ivan
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> >> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> >>
>
> --
>
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 14:53:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:09 GMT