W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > August 2007

RE: Error in (approved) test 0009

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:58:45 -0500
To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1186419525.15648.369.camel@pav>

On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 14:23 +0200, Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> >Obviously, the sparql should say:
> >
> >ASK WHERE {
> >	<http://example.org/Person2> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows>
> ><http://example.org/Person1> .
> >}
> >
> >that is the idea of 'rev':-)
> 
> DONE. Thanks for pointing it out!

If you changed the content of the test, the status should
revert to unapproved, right? i.e. a new decision should
be made to approve the new contents.

It seems to still be approved in
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaTC
last edited 2007-08-06 15:14:49 by MichaelHausenblas


Hmm... I'm assuming this test suite is organized roughly
like the RDF Core, OWL, SPARQL, and GRDDL test suites,
where approval of a test is always traceable to a recorded
decision. Is that the way this test suite is organized?
The "approved" status of 0018 "@rel for predicate"
and 0019 "@about for subject" and such don't seem
to have "resolution" pointers.

I see a manifest pointer;
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/rdfa-xhtml1-test-manifest.rdf
I haven't looked at the other end of it. I wonder if it's
kept in sync with the wiki page by hand. I guess I'll stay
tuned...



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 6 August 2007 16:59:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:09 GMT